GeForce Go 6200 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q with GeForce Go 6200, including specs and performance data.
P4200 Max-Q outperforms Go 6200 by a whopping 68750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 236 | 1568 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 21.30 | 0.19 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | NV44 A2 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 7 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 75 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 16 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 213.1 | 1.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.82 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | 2 |
| TMUs | 144 | 4 |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1753 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s | 4.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Palworld | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Palworld | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Palworld | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Palworld | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 24 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.54 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 1 February 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 16 Watt |
P4200 Max-Q has a 68750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 588% more advanced lithography process.
Go 6200, on the other hand, has 525% lower power consumption.
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce Go 6200 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
