GeForce GT 415M vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q with GeForce GT 415M, including specs and performance data.

P4200 Max-Q
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
27.48
+3883%

P4200 Max-Q outperforms 415M by a whopping 3883% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2371252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.274.45
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP104GF108
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)3 September 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230448
Core clock speed1215 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate213.14.000
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1448
L1 Cache864 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P4200 Max-Q 27.48
+3883%
GT 415M 0.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4200 Max-Q 11448
+3903%
Samples: 57
GT 415M 286
Samples: 22

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 32 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.48 0.69
Recency 21 February 2018 3 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 12 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has a 3883% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GT 415M, on the other hand, has 733% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 415M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 415M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 30 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 Max-Q or GeForce GT 415M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.