Tesla C2090 vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking754not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
Power efficiency10.31no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP107GF110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 February 2017 (9 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512
Core clock speed1228 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0341.66
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs1664
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P400 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 733% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2090, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P400 and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 530 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or Tesla C2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.