GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
Power efficiency10.31no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameGP107G71M
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2017 (9 years ago)1 June 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25654
Core clock speed1228 MHz14 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate20.03no data
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)GDDR3
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 1 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro P400 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 33% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P400 and GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 531 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.