FirePro S9300 X2 vs Quadro P400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking754not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
Power efficiency10.31no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP107Capsaicin
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 February 2017 (9 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.99 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096 ×2
Core clock speed1228 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1252 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate20.03217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.641 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1664 ×2
TMUs16256 ×2
L1 Cache96 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1002 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.06 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro P400 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P400 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 530 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P400 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.