GRID M40 vs Quadro P3200

Place in the ranking	312	756
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.07	6.14
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	GP104	GM107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (8 years ago)	18 May 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	384
Core clock speed	1328 MHz	1033 MHz
Boost clock speed	1543 MHz	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	172.8	33.06
Floating-point processing power	5.53 TFLOPS	0.7933 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	112	32
L1 Cache	672 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	1536 KB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB/s	83.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	6.1	5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	84 +425%	16−18 −425%
4K	28 +460%	5−6 −460%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +457%	21−24 −457%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +463%	8−9 −463%
Palworld	50−55 +456%	9−10 −456%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	45−50 +422%	9−10 −422%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	85−90 +431%	16−18 −431%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +457%	21−24 −457%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +463%	8−9 −463%
Far Cry 5	79 +464%	14−16 −464%
Fortnite	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Forza Horizon 4	95 +428%	18−20 −428%
Palworld	50−55 +456%	9−10 −456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +471%	14−16 −471%
Valorant	150−160 +459%	27−30 −459%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	85−90 +431%	16−18 −431%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +457%	21−24 −457%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	240−250 +436%	45−50 −436%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +463%	8−9 −463%
Dota 2	119 +467%	21−24 −467%
Far Cry 5	74 +429%	14−16 −429%
Fortnite	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Forza Horizon 4	88 +450%	16−18 −450%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 +443%	14−16 −443%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +463%	8−9 −463%
Palworld	50−55 +456%	9−10 −456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +471%	14−16 −471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	84 +425%	16−18 −425%
Valorant	150−160 +459%	27−30 −459%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	85−90 +431%	16−18 −431%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +463%	8−9 −463%
Dota 2	112 +433%	21−24 −433%
Far Cry 5	70 +483%	12−14 −483%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +500%	12−14 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +471%	14−16 −471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +475%	8−9 −475%
Valorant	150−160 +459%	27−30 −459%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Palworld	50−55 +456%	9−10 −456%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +438%	8−9 −438%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	140−150 +452%	27−30 −452%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +429%	7−8 −429%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +473%	30−33 −473%
Valorant	170−180 +490%	30−33 −490%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 +490%	10−11 −490%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +422%	9−10 −422%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +420%	10−11 −420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	45−50 +444%	9−10 −444%
Palworld	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +443%	7−8 −443%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Palworld	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +460%	5−6 −460%
Valorant	110−120 +429%	21−24 −429%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Dota 2	70−75 +492%	12−14 −492%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Palworld	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%

This is how Quadro P3200 and GRID M40 compete in popular games:

Quadro P3200 is 425% faster in 1080p
Quadro P3200 is 460% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.43	3.97
Recency	21 February 2018	18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt