Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU vs Quadro P3000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameN17E-Q1 Max-Qno data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 September 2017 (8 years ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128032
Core clock speed1075 MHz1296 MHz
Boost clock speed1240 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt44 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2017 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 44 Watt

Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU has an age advantage of 3 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3000 Max-Q and M1 Max 32-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 484 votes

Rate M1 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3000 Max-Q or M1 Max 32-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.