Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.92no data
Power efficiency18.00no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGP106Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (9 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1076 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate94.7273.60
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6432
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1280 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width160 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2017 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 16 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 433% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 and Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 838 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.