GeForce 305M vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Max-Q with GeForce 305M, including specs and performance data.

P2000 Max-Q
2017
4 GB GDDR5
12.85
+3469%

P2000 Max-Q outperforms 305M by a whopping 3469% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4371361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.99
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGP107GLGT218
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 July 2017 (9 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed1215 MHz525 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data14 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0368 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data55
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHzUp to 700 (DDR3), Up to 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P2000 Max-Q 12.85
+3469%
GeForce 305M 0.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P2000 Max-Q 5355
+3470%
Samples: 151
GeForce 305M 150
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
4K200−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Palworld 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 27−30 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Fortnite 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Palworld 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
Valorant 110−120
+331%
24−27
−331%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+1193%
14−16
−1193%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Dota 2 85−90
+760%
10−11
−760%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Fortnite 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+4800%
1−2
−4800%
Metro Exodus 27−30 0−1
Palworld 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+433%
6−7
−433%
Valorant 110−120
+331%
24−27
−331%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Dota 2 85−90
+760%
10−11
−760%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Valorant 110−120
+331%
24−27
−331%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
Palworld 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+2175%
4−5
−2175%
Valorant 120−130
+4100%
3−4
−4100%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 0−1
Palworld 18−20 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
Palworld 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12 0−1
Valorant 60−65
+1140%
5−6
−1140%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Palworld 10−11 0−1

This is how P2000 Max-Q and GeForce 305M compete in popular games:

  • P2000 Max-Q is 4900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the P2000 Max-Q is 9600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, P2000 Max-Q surpassed GeForce 305M in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.85 0.36
Recency 5 July 2017 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm

P2000 Max-Q has a 3469% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 305M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 305M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 Max-Q or GeForce 305M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.