Radeon Sky 900 vs Quadro NVS 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1389not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.64no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG98Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 January 2009 (17 years ago)27 March 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$131.43 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×23584 ×2
Core clock speed550 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400 ×2106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS ×23.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4 ×232 ×2
TMUs8 ×2112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cache16 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×26 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×2480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2009 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 300 Watt

NVS 420 has 650% lower power consumption.

Sky 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 420 and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 420 or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.