Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs Quadro NVS 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.64no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98Barcelo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 January 2009 (17 years ago)6 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$131.43 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×2448
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors210 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400 ×250.40
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS ×21.613 TFLOPS
ROPs4 ×28
TMUs8 ×228
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2009 6 January 2022
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 45 Watt

NVS 420 has 11% lower power consumption.

Graphics 448SP Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 89% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 420 and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 420 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 60 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 420 or Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.