ATI All-In-Wonder X800 vs Quadro NVS 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1294not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency2.03no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameG86R420
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 October 2007 (18 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed459 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors210 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.6728.000
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2007 21 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 130 nm

NVS 290 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 290 and All-In-Wonder X800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 290 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 290 or All-In-Wonder X800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.