ATI FirePro V4800 vs Quadro NVS 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1528not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.47no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNV44 A2Redwood
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 June 2006 (20 years ago)26 April 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27.99 $189

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data400
Core clock speed275 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors75 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10015.50
Floating-point processing powerno data0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs420
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2006 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 69 Watt

NVS 285 has 283% lower power consumption.

ATI V4800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 285 and FirePro V4800. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 64 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 285 or FirePro V4800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.