FirePro W4150M vs Quadro NVS 110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1524not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG72Mars
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2006 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7384
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors112 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.20020.40
ROPs28
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

W4150M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 110M and FirePro W4150M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro W4150M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or FirePro W4150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.