Rubin Ultra GPU vs Quadro M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking620not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.07no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameGM107GR110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (9 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51257344
Core clock speed756 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate31.264,062.5
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs321792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cache256 KB112 MB
L2 Cache2 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.010.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 3600 Watt

Quadro M620 has 11900% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M620 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 215 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M620 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.