Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M6-8Q M60-1Q M60-2Q M60-4A M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile Refresh 5000 X2 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015, $2,857
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
22.47

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms M5000 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking288209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.33no data
Power efficiency11.5929.58
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date29 June 2015 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed861 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate132.9259.2
Floating-point processing power4.252 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache768 KB3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.27.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M5000 22.47
RTX 5000 Max-Q 30.57
+36%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M5000 9363
Samples: 457
RTX 5000 Max-Q 12735
+36%
Samples: 250

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−41.3%
106
+41.3%
1440p45−50
−44.4%
65
+44.4%
4K30−35
−43.3%
43
+43.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p38.09no data
1440p63.49no data
4K95.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 108
+0%
108
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 145
+0%
145
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
+0%
83
+0%
Valorant 141
+0%
141
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro M5000 and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 41% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 44% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 43% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.47 30.57
Recency 29 June 2015 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 5000 Max-Q has a 36% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 88% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
Quadro P1000 NVIDIA Quadro P1000
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580
Quadro P600 NVIDIA Quadro P600
vs
210 OEM GeForce 210 OEM
Quadro P600 NVIDIA Quadro P600
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
RX 6500 XT RX 6500 XT
Tesla K40m NVIDIA Tesla K40m
vs
V5 Ultra
Quadro 7000 NVIDIA Quadro 7000
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
ATI HD 5450 ATI Radeon HD 5450
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
ATI HD 5750 ATI Radeon HD 5750
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 88 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 58 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M5000 or Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.