Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs Quadro M4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.32no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGM204Panther Lake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date18 August 2015 (11 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,280512
Core clock speed975 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate78.0073.60
Floating-point processing power2.496 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs8032
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L1 Cache480 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2015 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 833% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M4000M and Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 161 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M4000M or Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.