FirePro S9300 X2 vs Quadro M3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.70no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGM204Capsaicin
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date18 August 2015 (10 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,0244096 ×2
Core clock speed1050 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate67.20217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3264 ×2
TMUs64256 ×2
L1 Cache384 KB1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1253 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.0
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2015 31 March 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

M3000M has 300% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M3000M and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M3000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 389 votes

Rate Quadro M3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M3000M or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.