GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro K620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3050 A Mobile 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Mobile 3060 Max-Q 3060 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620 with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K620
2014, $190
2 GB 128-bit, 41 Watt
5.28
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
24.16
+358%

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms K620 by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking680265
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.11no data
Power efficiency9.0824.93
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM107GA106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (12 years ago)11 May 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed1058 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1035 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate26.9882.80
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache192 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K620 5.28
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 24.16
+358%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620 2200
Samples: 2906
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10065
+358%
Samples: 11354

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−369%
75
+369%
1440p9−10
−367%
42
+367%
4K5−6
−440%
27
+440%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.87no data
1440p21.10no data
4K37.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 94
+0%
94
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 71
+0%
71
+0%
Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Quadro K620 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 369% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 367% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 440% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.28 24.16
Recency 22 July 2014 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro K620 has 83% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 358% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Max-Q
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB 3060 8 GB
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile 5070 Mobile
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 5070 Ti Mobile
GRID K500 GRID K500
vs
RTX 3060 Ti 3060 Ti
GRID K1 GRID K1
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 5060 Ti 8 GB
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
V7900 SDI V7900 SDI
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
GeForce MX110 MX110
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
T1000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 812 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4898 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620 or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.