GRID K340 vs Quadro K610M

Place in the ranking	999	834
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	0.02
Power efficiency	4.44	1.01
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GK208	GK107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013 (13 years ago)	23 July 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229.99	$3,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Quadro K610M has 400% better value for money than GRID K340.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	384 ×4
Core clock speed	980 MHz	950 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	15.68	30.40 ×4
Floating-point processing power	0.3763 TFLOPS	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs	8	8 ×4
TMUs	16	32 ×4
L1 Cache	16 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB ×4
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed	650 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	20.8 GB/s	28.8 GB/s ×4
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−50%

18−21
+50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

19.17

+856%

183.28
−856%

Quadro K610M has 856% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Fortnite	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Valorant	35−40 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	35−40 −66.7%	60−65 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Fortnite	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Valorant	35−40 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Valorant	35−40 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

7−8
−42.9%

10−11

+42.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Valorant	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%