FirePro V7900 SDI vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking323not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.54no data
Power efficiency6.65no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGK110BCayman
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (13 years ago)24 May 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28801280
Core clock speed797 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt224 Watt
Texture fill rate216.558.00
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs24080
L1 Cache240 KB320 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 224 Watt

Quadro K6000 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

V7900 SDI, on the other hand, has 0% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K6000 and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 115 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K6000 or FirePro V7900 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.