Radeon HD 7470M vs Quadro K600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6430M 6450M 6470M 6490M 6490M Mac Edition 7410M 7430M 7450M 7470M 7490M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K600 with Radeon HD 7470M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K600
2013, $199
1 GB DDR3, 41 Watt
1.72
+75.5%

K600 outperforms HD 7470M by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
HD 7470M HD 7470M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9951176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency3.2510.84
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK107Seymour
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (13 years ago)7 January 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192160
Core clock speed876 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate14.026.400
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS0.256 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K600 1.72
+75.5%
HD 7470M 0.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K600 716
+75.9%
Samples: 1291
HD 7470M 407
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Palworld 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 41 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.72 0.98
Recency 1 March 2013 7 January 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 7 Watt

Quadro K600 has a 76% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7470M, on the other hand, has 486% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7470M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7470M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
HD 7470M Radeon HD 7470M
vs
HD 7570M Radeon HD 7570M
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
NVS 510 NVS 510
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
T1000
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
T1000 8 GB 8 GB
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
RTX 4060 4060
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
Arc A310 A310
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 8 GB
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
Tesla C2090 Tesla C2090
vs
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
T1000 Mobile T1000 Mobile
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 5060 Ti 8 GB
NVS 300 NVS 300
vs
GTX 745 OEM 745 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 218 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 122 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K600 or Radeon HD 7470M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.