GMA X4500 vs Quadro K3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking764not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.73no data
Power efficiency3.99no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameGK104Eaglelake
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (14 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$155 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57680
Core clock speed654 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate31.392.132
Floating-point processing power0.7534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs484
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 13 Watt

K3000M has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 477% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K3000M and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K3000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GMA X4500 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 70 votes

Rate Quadro K3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 373 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K3000M or GMA X4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.