ATI All-In-Wonder X800 SE vs Quadro K3000M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 764 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.73 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.99 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | R400 (2004−2008) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | R420 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 (14 years ago) | 27 April 2005 (21 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 576 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 160 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 3.400 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7534 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 |
| TMUs | 48 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0b (9_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2012 | 27 April 2005 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
K3000M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro K3000M and All-In-Wonder X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro K3000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 SE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
