GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile vs Quadro K2000D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2000D with GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

K2000D
2013, $599
2 GB GDDR5, 51 Watt
3.86

RTX 5080 Mobile outperforms K2000D by a whopping 1540% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.8661.22
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGK107GB203
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (13 years ago)2 April 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847680
Core clock speed954 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53360.0
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cache32 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA3.012.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K2000D 3.86
RTX 5080 Mobile 63.30
+1540%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2000D 1610
Samples: 180
RTX 5080 Mobile 26372
+1538%
Samples: 2068

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−1700%
144
+1700%
1440p5−6
−1760%
93
+1760%
4K3−4
−1767%
56
+1767%

Cost per frame, $

1080p74.88no data
1440p119.80no data
4K199.67no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 345
+0%
345
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Palworld 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 273
+0%
273
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170
+0%
170
+0%
Metro Exodus 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Palworld 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 419
+0%
419
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 205
+0%
205
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 205
+0%
205
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+0%
168
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how K2000D and RTX 5080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 Mobile is 1700% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5080 Mobile is 1760% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5080 Mobile is 1767% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.86 63.30
Recency 1 March 2013 2 April 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 80 Watt

K2000D has 57% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1540% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000D in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000D is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro K2000D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 279 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2000D or GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.