UHD Graphics 600 vs Quadro K1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1200 with UHD Graphics 600, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K1200
2015, $322
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.10
+788%

K1200 outperforms Graphics 600 by a whopping 788% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6001217
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.18no data
Power efficiency12.2112.38
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Gemini Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)11 December 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed954 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate33.067.800
Floating-point processing power1.0578 TFLOPS0.1248 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs3212
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K1200 7.10
+788%
UHD Graphics 600 0.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2958
+786%
Samples: 779
UHD Graphics 600 334

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+750%
10
−750%
1440p8−9
+700%
1
−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.79no data
1440p40.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Palworld 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Quadro K1200 and UHD Graphics 600 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K1200 is 750% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K1200 is 700% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 34 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.10 0.80
Recency 28 January 2015 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 5 Watt

Quadro K1200 has a 788% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
HD 7600G Radeon HD 7600G
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
Quadro M5000 M5000
vs
RX 590 GME RX 590 GME
Quadro M5000 M5000
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
Quadro M5000 M5000
vs
RTX 3070 16 GB RTX 3070 16 GB
Quadro M5000 M5000
vs
RX 6700 RX 6700
Quadro M6000 M6000
vs
Apple M4 40-core GPU M4 40 core GPU
Quadro K1200 K1200
vs
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
Quadro K1200 K1200
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
Quadro K420 K420
vs
HD 7470A HD 7470A
Quadro K420 K420
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 139 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 4203 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1200 or UHD Graphics 600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.