Arc A550M vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 100HX-210 Quadro GV100 PG500-216 PG503-216 V100 PCIe V100 PCIe 16 GB V100 PCIe 32 GB V100 SMX2 V100 SXM2 V100 SXM2 16 GB V100 SXM2 32 GB V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018, $8,999
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.51
+96.2%

GV100 outperforms A550M by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
Arc A550M Arc A550M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.16no data
Power efficiency13.7729.25
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGV100DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 March 2018 (8 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202048
Core clock speed1132 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6262.4
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs320128
Tensor Cores640256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache10 MB3 MB
L2 Cache6 MB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.0-
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.51 22.69
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 60 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 96% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 317% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A550M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Arc Pro B70 Arc Pro B70
Arc A550M Arc A550M
vs
Arc Pro B390 Arc Pro B390
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
P104-101 P104 101
vs
Tesla T40 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
P104-101 P104 101
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
G450 LP
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
G450 x2 MMS
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
L40G L40G
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
T500 Max-Q T500 Max-Q
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 55 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 102 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.