Radeon RX 9070 XT vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GP100 with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GP100
2016
16 GB HBM2, 235 Watt
33.69

9070 XT outperforms GP100 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17532
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.84
Power efficiency11.1716.49
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGP100Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (10 years ago)6 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844096
Core clock speed1304 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate323.0760.3
Floating-point processing power10.34 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs224256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache1.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed715 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.0-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GP100 33.69
RX 9070 XT 64.36
+91%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GP100 14096
Samples: 41
RX 9070 XT 26926
+91%
Samples: 18622

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110206
+106%
1440p60−65
−48.3%
116
4K35−4073
+109%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.91
1440pno data5.16
4Kno data8.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Resident Evil 4 Remake 190−200 190−200

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 296 296
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 285 285
Far Cry 6 265 265
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180 170−180
Metro Exodus 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 497 497
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 270 270
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 257 257
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Far Cry 6 210 210
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140 130−140
Metro Exodus 110−120 110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 90−95
Far Cry 5 260 260
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 220−230
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197 197

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Far Cry 6 126 126
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 160−170
Metro Exodus 70−75 70−75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168 168
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 152 152
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how Quadro GP100 and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 106% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT is 93% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT is 109% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.69 64.36
Recency 1 October 2016 6 March 2025
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 304 Watt

Quadro GP100 has 23% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has a 91% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro GP100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GP100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3961 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GP100 or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.