Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GP100 with Radeon RX 7700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GP100
2016
16 GB HBM2, 235 Watt
33.69
RX 7700 XT
2023, $449
12 GB GDDR6, 245 Watt
54.42
+61.5%

7700 XT outperforms GP100 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17555
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.42
Power efficiency11.1717.30
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGP100Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (10 years ago)25 August 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843456
Core clock speed1304 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz2544 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate323.0549.5
Floating-point processing power10.34 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs224216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cache1.3 MB768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed715 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GP100 33.69
RX 7700 XT 54.42
+61.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GP100 14096
Samples: 41
RX 7700 XT 22769
+61.5%
Samples: 2993

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120185
+68.2%
1440p60−65
−41.2%
102
4K35−4059
+68.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.43
1440pno data4.40
4Kno data7.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 351 351
Cyberpunk 2077 193 193
Hogwarts Legacy 196 196
Resident Evil 4 Remake 229 229

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 344 344
Cyberpunk 2077 158 158
Far Cry 5 188 188
Fortnite 240−250 240−250
Forza Horizon 4 278 278
Hogwarts Legacy 161 161
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 243 243
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 132 132
Far Cry 5 181 181
Fortnite 240−250 240−250
Forza Horizon 4 272 272
Grand Theft Auto V 166 166
Hogwarts Legacy 119 119
Metro Exodus 152 152
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 295 295
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 122 122
Far Cry 5 167 167
Forza Horizon 4 231 231
Hogwarts Legacy 91 91
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168 168
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 240−250 240−250

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 127 127
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450 400−450
Grand Theft Auto V 105 105
Metro Exodus 90 90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 80 80
Far Cry 5 157 157
Forza Horizon 4 197 197
Hogwarts Legacy 67 67
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120 120

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 31 31
Grand Theft Auto V 112 112
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 35−40
Metro Exodus 57 57
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89 89
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 36 36
Far Cry 5 82 82
Forza Horizon 4 134 134
Hogwarts Legacy 36 36
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how Quadro GP100 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 68% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 70% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 69% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.69 54.42
Recency 1 October 2016 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 245 Watt

Quadro GP100 has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 4% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 62% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 69% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro GP100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GP100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2918 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GP100 or Radeon RX 7700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.