GeForce FX 5700 vs Quadro FX Go1400
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX Go1400 with GeForce FX 5700, including specs and performance data.
Go1400 outperforms FX 5700 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1444 | 1533 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.31 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Rankine (2003−2005) |
| GPU code name | NV41 | NV36 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 February 2005 (21 years ago) | 23 October 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 275 MHz | 425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 222 million | 82 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.200 | 1.700 |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-III | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 295 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 18.88 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 9.0a |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.5 (2.1) |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.24 | 0.10 |
| Recency | 25 February 2005 | 23 October 2003 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
FX Go1400 has a 140% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The Quadro FX Go1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX Go1400 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
