GeForce4 410 Go vs Quadro FX 5800
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 833 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.19 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | NV17 A3 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 (17 years ago) | 6 February 2002 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 29 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 189 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 48.80 | 0.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6221 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 32 | 2 |
| TMUs | 80 | 4 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 MB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 3.2 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 8.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 November 2008 | 6 February 2002 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 150 nm |
FX 5800 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5800 and GeForce4 410 Go. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 5800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce4 410 Go is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
