Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs Quadro FX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1321not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.93no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameG96CNavi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 April 2009 (17 years ago)15 November 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324480
Core clock speed450 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors314 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200707.0
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8128
TMUs16280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache32 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm280 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.9
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 April 2009 15 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 281 Watt

FX 580 has 603% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 580 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 105 votes

Rate Quadro FX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 580 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.