Tesla S2050 vs Quadro FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1104not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.56no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG80GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2007 (19 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $11,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128448 ×4
Core clock speed600 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors681 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4032.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs2448 ×4
TMUs3256 ×4
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache96 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB3 GB ×4
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed800 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 March 2007 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 900 Watt

FX 5600 has 426% lower power consumption.

Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5600 and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5600 or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.