GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost vs Quadro FX 380M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1415not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT218no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)3 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1624
Core clock speed606 MHzno data
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.848no data
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

FX 380M has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380M and GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380M or GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.