HD Graphics P4700 vs Quadro FX 370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1457not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameG98Haswell GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 August 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8160
Core clock speed550 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors210 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate2.20026.00
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs420
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 86 Watt

FX 370M has 330% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 195% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370M and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370M is a mobile workstation graphics card while HD Graphics P4700 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370M or HD Graphics P4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.