ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 vs Quadro FX 3700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1153not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.10no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG92R580
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)13 January 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$925 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed550 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors754 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.208.000
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs6416
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz477 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s30.53 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 13 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm

FX 3700M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700M and All-In-Wonder X1900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X1900 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder X1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700M or All-In-Wonder X1900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.