GeForce FX 5500 vs Quadro FX 3700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3700 with GeForce FX 5500, including specs and performance data.

FX 3700
2008, $1,599
512 MB GDDR3, 78 Watt
0.89
+4350%

FX 3700 outperforms FX 5500 by a whopping 4350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12031577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.88no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV34 B1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 January 2008 (18 years ago)17 March 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $36.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz270 MHz
Number of transistors754 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.001.080
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs564
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mm152 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3700 0.89
+4350%
FX 5500 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3700 371
+4538%
Samples: 285
FX 5500 8
Samples: 178

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.02
Recency 8 January 2008 17 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

FX 3700 has a 4350% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro FX 3700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5500 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 25 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 177 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700 or GeForce FX 5500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.