GeForce4 420 Go vs Quadro FX 370 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 370 LP with GeForce4 420 Go, including specs and performance data.

FX 370 LP
2008, $129
256 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.26
+2500%

370 LP outperforms GeForce4 420 Go by a whopping 2500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14381607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.80no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG98NV17 A5
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 November 2008 (17 years ago)6 February 2002 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82
Core clock speed540 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data190 MHz
Number of transistors210 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.3200.8
Floating-point processing power0.01728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 370 LP 0.26
+2500%
GeForce4 420 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 370 LP 108
+3500%
Samples: 2
GeForce4 420 Go 3
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 24 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.01
Recency 6 November 2008 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

FX 370 LP has a 2500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro FX 370 LP is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 420 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370 LP is a workstation graphics card while GeForce4 420 Go is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce4 420 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370 LP or GeForce4 420 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.