ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1527not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG72RV620
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date13 March 2006 (20 years ago)2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores740
Core clock speed450 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate1.8001.600
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x VHDCI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 32 Watt

FX 350M has 113% lower power consumption.

ATI 2450 Multi-View, on the other hand, has a 64% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and FirePro 2450 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350M or FirePro 2450 Multi-View, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.