Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs Quadro FX 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1468not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.74no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameG72Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (20 years ago)15 November 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4480
Core clock speed550 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors112 million57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200707.0
ROPs2128
TMUs4280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm280 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.9
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 15 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 281 Watt

FX 350 has 1238% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.