FirePro S9300 X2 vs Quadro FX 3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.34no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV41Capsaicin
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 July 2005 (21 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135.75 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096 ×2
Core clock speed425 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors190 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)83 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate5.100217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs12256 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length226 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.0
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 July 2005 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 83 Watt 300 Watt

FX 3450 has 261% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3450 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3450 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.