RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Quadro FX 3400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV45AD103
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date28 June 2004 (22 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data9728
Core clock speed350 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors222 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)101 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate5.600510.7
Floating-point processing powerno data32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs16304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 101 Watt 120 Watt

FX 3400 has 19% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3400 and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3400 or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.