GeForce RTX 5060 vs Quadro FX 3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated70
Place by popularitynot in top-1001
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiencyno data26.44
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNV45GB206
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2004 (22 years ago)19 May 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed350 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2497 MHz
Number of transistors222 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)101 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate5.600299.6
Floating-point processing powerno data19.18 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs16120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data3.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 19 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 101 Watt 145 Watt

FX 3400 has 44% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3400 and GeForce RTX 5060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 8293 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3400 or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.