GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Quadro FX 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3000 with GeForce4 Ti 4200, including specs and performance data.

FX 3000
2003, $203
256 MB DDR
0.17
+1600%

FX 3000 outperforms Ti 4200 by a whopping 1600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14921587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameNV35NV25 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2003 (23 years ago)6 February 2002 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$203 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors135 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate3.2002.000
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 4x
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a8.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)1.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3000 0.17
+1600%
GeForce4 Ti 4200 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3000 69
+1280%
Samples: 14
GeForce4 Ti 4200 5
Samples: 55

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.01
Recency 22 July 2003 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

FX 3000 has a 1600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro FX 3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce4 Ti 4200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 64 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000 or GeForce4 Ti 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.