ATI FirePro V8800 vs Quadro FX 2800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1172not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.02no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG92Cypress
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 December 2009 (16 years ago)7 April 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961600
Core clock speed600 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors754 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt208 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8066.00
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPS2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4880
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache64 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2009 7 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 208 Watt

FX 2800M has 177% lower power consumption.

ATI V8800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2800M and FirePro V8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro V8800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2800M or FirePro V8800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.