CMP 50HX vs Quadro FX 2500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1301not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG71TU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)24 June 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323584
Core clock speed500 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors278 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00296.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s560.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2005 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 250 Watt

FX 2500M has 456% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2500M and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 85 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2500M or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.