UHD Graphics 710 Mobile vs Quadro FX 1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1181not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.26no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG94Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 March 2009 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$489 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64128
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6011.60
Floating-point processing power0.176 TFLOPS0.3712 TFLOPS
ROPs124
TMUs328
L2 Cache48 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount768 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has an age advantage of 13 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 293% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1800 and UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 145 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 13 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1800 or UHD Graphics 710 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.