HD Graphics 400 vs Quadro FX 1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1800 with HD Graphics 400, including specs and performance data.

FX 1800
2009, $489
768 MB GDDR3, 59 Watt
0.96

HD Graphics 400 outperforms FX 1800 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11811156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.2613.41
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameG94Braswell GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 March 2009 (17 years ago)1 April 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$489 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6496
Core clock speed550 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors505 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate17.607.200
Floating-point processing power0.176 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs122
TMUs3212
L2 Cache48 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount768 MB8 GB
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 1.04
Recency 30 March 2009 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 967% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 883% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 1800 and HD Graphics 400.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 400 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 145 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 459 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1800 or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.