GeForce 405M vs Quadro FX 1700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1338not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.63no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG96GT218
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)5 January 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed625 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors314 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate10.004.848
Floating-point processing power0.0992 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs84
TMUs168
L2 Cache32 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 API
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce 405M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 257% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700M and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1700M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 405M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1700M or GeForce 405M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.