GeForce G110M vs Quadro FX 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1305not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG84G96C
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)8 January 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed460 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors289 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate7.3603.200
Floating-point processing power0.05888 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs84
TMUs168
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce G110M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700 and GeForce G110M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce G110M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1700 or GeForce G110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.